Bookmark and Share

Alex Bäcker's Wiki / Proving whether all languages derive from one
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Proving whether all languages derive from one

Page history last edited by PBworks 17 years, 5 months ago

Interestingly, the question of whether all languages descend from one is still controversial. Analyses of faraway languages have revealed degrees of similarity, but whether this is statistically significantly different from chance for the most distant branches of the language tree remains controversial. Here I propose a method to unambiguously answer this question.

 

Take a table whose columns correspond to languages and whose rows correspond to meanings. Each cell contains the word for the corresponding meaning in the corresponding language. If, for every pair of languages, the similarity between vocabularies, using any metric of similarity which assigns shorter distances for vocabularies that are more similar or easier to evolve from one another, the average distance between the languages is statistically significantly smaller than that between fictitious vocabularies where the rows have been rearranged randomly for each column, then all languages can be said to be related. Furthermore, the same can be said if this can be done for reconstructed ancestors corresponding to all branchpoints in an evolutionary tree of languages. Indeed, as long as the statistical test properly accounts for multiple comparisons, all that is needed is that each language be related to the rest via a connected graph (a graph such that there exists a path between all pairs of vertices). If we are to assay the origin of language, we must ensure that any similarity due to later lateral influences between languages are ignored. Concentrating on words for primitive concepts, whose words tend to be old and change little, is one way to do this.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.